-
-
Recent Posts
- It’s because you’re no fun Joe…
- Lucky for him he left the rear fender on….
- We need solutions, not problems….
- Let out by Liberal judge, man kidnaps family and robs bank
- Teen arrested for robbing another teen’s lemonade stand
- I actually had a burglar threaten to sue me once because I set a dog on him
- Keeping it real….
- When dogs drive….
- It just keeps getting better….
- Even better than solar…
Archives
Categories
liberty , constitution , three percent , patriot , guns , ar15 , politics,eatgrueldog
- Follow Eatgrueldog on WordPress.com
Eatgrueldog 
Any husband who has had to listen to his wife explain that she didn’t spend $600, she actually saved $400 cause all those clothes were on sale can fully understand that logic.
But yeah, maff is hard.
LikeLike
Yah, especially when someone tries to explain the 13%/90% problem isn’t a problem.
LikeLike
WTF?
LikeLike
Not going to suggest looking at the actual data. Numbers. If N crimes are committed by one group, and X crimes are committed by another group, and N > X, and group X is many times larger than group N, then there is an obvious problem. And this just happens to be the actual situation. The raw numbers of the 13% exceed the raw numbers of the 75%, and the conclusion is that the 13% group has a nearly 6x greater crime rate.
But yeah, maff is hard. And graphs is raycis.
LikeLike
Tell me you’re clueless without saying you’re clueless.
LikeLike
This erronious stuff never happened back in my High School days when we used slide rukles.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Tanks for splainin that…..
LikeLike
Maffs n graffs, defnitly rayciss, defnitly,defnitly.
LikeLike